At the time of writing this post, I have read 287 of its 488 pages. I will finish it, but it has been a disappointment. Before saying what I don't like in it, I will reproduce for you the index of major sections, chapters, and subsections of the first 100 pages:
PRESENT TIME - STARDATE 58188.4 TO 58193.8
1 March 10, 2381 Common Era, Gregorian Calendar - A Tuesday
DTI Branch Office - San Francisco, North Am, Earth - 18:32 UTC
U.S.S. Everett NCC-72392 - March 12, 2381 CE (A Thursday) - 03:14 UTC
03:21 UTC
05:47 UTC
06:11 UTC
08:27 UTC
Regulus Passenger Lines Transport Verity - 10:36 UTC
U.S.S. Everett - 11:02 UTC
11:37 UTC
18:02 UTC
18:27 UTC
DOWNTIME - STARDATE 41697.9 TO 41906.7
2 Kartika 13, 2286 Saka Era, Indian National Calendar - A Wednesday
Dulmur Residence - Motilal City, Nehru Colony - 05:46 UTC
Indira City - 13:27 UTC
Dulmur Residence - 17:54 UTC
Vandor IV - Agrahayana 7, 2286 SE (A Friday) - 20:43 UTC
20:52 UTC
PRESENT TIME - STARDATE 58281 TO 58365.9
3 Julian Day 2590805 - A Monday
DTI Headquarters - Greenwich, European Alliance, Earth - 14:11 UTC
Julian Days 2590812 to 2590823
Julian Days 2590825 to 2590833
Julian Days 2590834 to 2590838
Julian Days 2590841 to 2590849
DOWNTIME - STARDATE 42692.8 TO 42704.5
4 Day 18 of et'Khior, Year of ShiKahr 9051 - A Saturday
Lucsly Residence - San Francisco - 14:54 UTC
DTI Branch Office - San Francisco - 16:14 UTC
Shuttlecraft Deutsch - Traversing Sector 006 - 21:16 UTC
Warlock Station - 19 et'Khior, YS 9051 (A Sunday) - 19:59 UTC
20 et'Khior, YS 9051 (A Monday) - 07:06 UTC
What is immediately apparent from the titles of the major sections is the alternance of events in the present and downtime (i.e., in the past).
First of all, according to Wikipedia, Star Trek The Next Generation Writer's/Director's Guide of March 23, 1987 (p. 13) defines stardate as follows:
A stardate is a five-digit number followed by a decimal point and one more digit. Example: "41254.7." The first two digits of the stardate are always "41." The 4 stands for 24th century, the 1 indicates first season. The additional three leading digits will progress unevenly during the course of the season from 000 to 999. The digit following the decimal point is generally regarded as a day counter.As the DTI series is contemporary to TNG and Voyager, stardates beginning with 58 are wrong. Another mistake: the differences in stardates of the major sections are clearly too large. For example, 5.4 in the first section, while everything happens between a Tuesday and a Thusday, which would imply a stardate change of 0.3.
But there is a more substantial problem: headings are meant to help the reader understand what's going on, but things like "Kartika 13, 2286 Saka Era" and "Day 18 of et'Khior" are at best irrelevant and at worst confusing. Furthermore, and somewhat ridiculously, although the dates are given in a cryptic way, the hours are always given in UTC and there is always the day of the week. Does Bennett expects us to believe that Greenwich time is used on a planet that follows an "et'Khior" calendar (whatever that is)? Or that they have seven-day weeks? I find it pathetic.
Before I forget, the Julian Day of January 1, 2000, was 2,451,545. How can it suddenly be back to 2590805 in 2381?
I hate useless/wrong/confusing things only done for show!
The bottom line is that you should only look at the distinction between PRESENT TIME and DOWNTIME, consider the UTC time (which is sometimes marginally useful), and ignore the rest.
Besides the detail I have just talked about, there are two further (and, in my opinion, more serious) issues: the first one concerns the use of references to events described in the TV series, and the second one has to do with how the story flows (or doesn't).
Bennett seems to have gone out of his way to cram into the novel as many references as possible to timeflow-related incidents that occurred to Kirk, Picard, and Janeway. For a fan, it is nice to find references, but Bennett does it excessively. As far as I can see, he refers to all time-inversions and time-loops that occurred in the TV series, with descriptions and stardates. After the first couple, I started thinking: Oh no... not another one! I'm curious to see what he will refer to in his second novel...
But I have left last the biggest criticism I have about this novel: it is full of irrelevant facts, which only contribute to interrupt the flow of the narrative. I'm pretty confident that if we removed all Downtime sections, the main story would come out better. Flashbacks have been used in fiction for centuries. Some novels have even been written as single flashbacks. But these Downtime stories are like self-contained short stories, with little or no connection to the main story. He didn't need so many flashbacks to introduce the characters and provide context.
In general, I find the main story fragmentary and unfocussed. It might be due to the presence of so many distracting flashbacks, but I am not sure. Perhaps Bennett thought that the silly dates, the many references to past events, and the plethora of races new and old would keep ST fans happy. But it is nothing more than a heap of clutter. There is no substitute for a good plot presented in a clean, uncluttered way. Especially when talking about time travel.
No comments:
Post a Comment